<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>vet-202501-0003</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2025</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalName>Veterin&#225;rn&#237; medic&#237;na</b:PeriodicalName>
<b:Volume>70</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>1</b:Issue>
<b:Pages>11-19</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Costa</b:Last><b:First>RC</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Moraes</b:Last><b:First>GG</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Ferreira</b:Last><b:First>RG</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Neto</b:Last><b:First>RB</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Nobile</b:Last><b:First>M</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Rocha</b:Last><b:First>TASS</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Barros</b:Last><b:First>LP</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Minto</b:Last><b:First>BW</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Dias</b:Last><b:First>LGGG</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Assessment of the accuracy of patient-specific drilling guides for cervical (C5-C6) and lumbar (L4-L5) vertebrae in cats</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Ten sets of&#160;vertebral biomodels and the corresponding drilling guides were created to&#160;evaluate the implantation accuracy in&#160;the cervical (C5-C6) and lumbar (L4-L5) vertebrae of&#160;cats. Smooth pins were implanted using the guides on&#160;the right side of&#160;five randomly assigned biomodel sets and on&#160;the left side of&#160;the remaining sets, with the contralateral side undergoing freehand implantation. Subsequently, a&#160;new tomographic study was conducted to&#160;measure the implantation angles. The pre-implantation angles were compared with the post-implantation angles between the techniques and among the sets. The guide-assisted implantation exhibited a&#160;lower dispersion compared to&#160;the freehand technique, with coefficients of&#160;variation of&#160;-1.95 and 48.9 in&#160;the cervical vertebrae and 1.98 and 9.39 in&#160;the lumbar vertebrae, respectively. However, no&#160;statistical difference was observed between the pre- and post-implantation angles, nor when comparing the vertebral segments (P &amp;gt; 0.05). Under the study conditions, the use of&#160;the guide failed to&#160;result in&#160;more accurate implantations in&#160;the C5-C6 and L4-L5 vertebral biomodels of&#160;cats.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
