Vet Med - Czech, 2003, 48(1):200 | DOI: 10.17221/5744-VETMED
Comparative studies of early season moxidectin treatment and conventional ivermectin/ benzimidazole treatments in the control of cyathostomes in horses
- Department of Zoology and Fishery, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic
Moxidectin administered in January or February at a single dose was tested for efficacy in horses on two farms for 12 and 11 months, respectively. Horses were infected with cyathostomes naturally in the previous grazing period. Forty horses of farm 1 and 20 horses of farm 2 were used in controlled tests to evaluate the efficacy of moxidectin 2% gel formulation at the dosage 0.4 mg moxidectin per kg of live weight, ivermectin commercial paste formulation at the dosage 0.2 mg ivermectin per kg of live weight, mebendazole and fenbendazole commercial paste formulation at the dosage both 7.5 mg mebendazole and fenbendazole per kg of live weight, all applied orally. Three control groups of 10 horses each (farm 1) were treated twice a year with ivermectin and benzimidazoles, respectively. Individual faecal egg counts, faecal cultures and larval differentiation were performed. Moxidectin had more prolonged and greater suppressive effects on the post-treatment reappearance and magnitude of strongyle egg counts than did ivermectin or benzimidazoles. In the moxidectin treated group (M1) strongyle eggs were seen for the first time in April and a slight increase in the mean count of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) was observed during the rest of the season. Litter larval counts significantly reflected levels of exposure during the tested season. Twenty animals of farm 2 were allocated into two groups of ten horses each based on pre-treatment eggs per gram (EPG) counts (moxidectin treated group and control group). In the moxidectin treated group mean egg counts remained very low throughout the study. A plateau was reached by autumn, with egg counts ranging from 74 to 145 EPG. The faecal egg counts of moxidectin treated group (M2) were significantly higher in March, April, May and June.
Keywords: horses; control of cyathostomes; anthelmintic treatments; moxidectin; epidemiology
Published: January 31, 2003 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Abbot E.M. (1998): Larval cyathostomosis Part 2: Prevention. Equine Prac., 20, 6-8.
- Craig T.M. (1999): Considerations for the control of equine cyathostomes in arid areas. Vet. Parasitol., 85, 181- 188.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Eysker M., Jansen J., Mirck M.H. (1984): Inhibited development of cyathostominae in the horse in the early third stage. Res. Vet. Sci., 37, 355-356.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Giles C.J., Urquhart K.H., Longstaffe J.A. (1985): Larval cyathostomyasis (immature trichonema-induced enteropathy): A report of 15 clinical cases. Equine Vet. J., 17, 186-201.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hasslinger M.A. (1981): Untersuchungen über den Einfluss verschidenen Temperaturen auf Eier und Larven von Pferdenstrongyliden sowie das Verhalten dieser exogenen Stadien auf der Weide. Berl. Münch. Tierarztl. Wschr., 94, 1-5.
- Hasslinger M.A., Bi ner G. (1984): Seasonal dynamics of horse strongyle larvae and its relationship to risk of infection at pasture. J. Vet. Med. B, 31, 25-31
- Herd R.P. (1986): Parasite control in horses. Seasonal use of equine anthelmintics. Modern Vet. Pract., 67, 895- 898.
- Herd R.P., Coles G.C. (1995): Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of horses in the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec., 136, 481-485.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Herd R.P., Willarson K.L., Gabel A.A. (1985): Epidemiologic approach to the control of horse strongyles. Equine Vet. J., 17, 202-207.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Klei T.R., French D.D. (1998): Small strongyles: An emerging parasite problem for horses. Equine Pract., 20, 26-30.
- Langrová I. (1998): Seasonal prevalence and intensity of faecal parasite egg (larval) output in various categories of herd of horses during two grazing seasons. Helminthologia, 35, 43-50.
- Langrová I., Navrátil I., Jankovská I. (2001): Long-term influence of late-winter use of ivermectin on the nematode of subfamily Cyathostominae. Sci. Agric. Bohemica, 32, 245-253.
- Lyons E. T.,Tolliver S.C, Drudge J.H. (1999): Historical perspective of cyathostomes: prevalence, treatment and control programs. Vet. Parasitol., 85, 97-112.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Monohan C.M., Chapman M.R., Taylor H.W., French D.D., Klei T.R. (1996): Comparison of moxidectin oral gel and ivermectin oral paste against a spectrum of internal parasites of ponies with special a ention to encysted cyathostome larvae. Vet. Parasitol., 63, 225- 235.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Murphy D., Keane M.P., Chandler K.J., Goulding R. (1997): Cyathostome-associated disease in the horse: Investigation and management of four cases. Equine Vet. Educat., 9, 247-252.
Go to original source...
- Ogbourne C.P. (1975): Studies on the epidemiology of Strongylus vulgaris infection of the horse. Int. J. Parasitol., 5, 423-426
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ogbourne C.P. (1978): Pathogenesis of cyathostome (Trichonema) infections of the horse. A rewiew. Commonwealth Institute of Helminthology Miscellaneous Publication No. 5. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, Buckinghamshire, England.
- Reinemeyer C.R. (1999): Current concerns about control programs in temperate climates. Vet. Parasitol., 85, 163-172.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Reinemeyer C R., Smith S.A., Gabel A.A., Herd R.P. (1986): Observations on the population dynamics of five cythostome nematode species of horses in northern USA. Equine Vet. J., 18, 121-124.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- SAS Institute Inc. (1989): Users Quide, version 4, Cary, N.C., SAS Institute Inc.
- Uhlinger C.A. (1991): Equine small strongyles: Epidemiology, pathology and control. Comp. Cont. Ed. Pract. Vet., 13, 332-335.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.