Vet Med - Czech, 2010, 55(10):483-493 | DOI: 10.17221/2940-VETMED

From research to farm: ex ante evaluation of strategic deworming in pig finishing

J. Van Meensel1, A. Kanora2, L. Lauwers1,4, J. Jourquin3, L. Goossens3, G. Van Huylenbroeck4
1 Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium
2 Moldergem 65, B-9630 Zwalm, Belgium
3 Janssen Animal Health Beerse, Belgium
4 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

This paper upgrades generic and partial information from parasitological research for farm-specific decision support, using two methods from managerial sciences: partial budgeting and frontier analysis. The analysis focuses on strategic deworming in pig finishing and assesses both effects on economic performance and nutrient efficiency. The application of partial budgeting and frontier analysis is based on a production-theoretical system analysis which is necessary to integrate parasitological research results to assess aggregate economic and environmental impacts. Results show that both statistically significant and insignificant parasitological research results have to be taken into account. Partial budgeting and frontier analysis appear to be complementary methods: partial budgeting yields more discriminatory and communicative results, while frontier methods provide additional diagnostics through exploring optimization possibilities and economic-environmental trade-offs. Strategic deworming results in a win-win effect on economic and environmental performances. Gross margin increases with 3 to 12 € per average present finisher per year, depending on the cyclic pig price conditions. The impact on the nutrient balance ranges from +0.2 to -0.5 kg nitrogen per average present finisher per year. The observed efficiency improvements are mainly technical and further economic and environmental optimizations can be achieved through input re-allocation. A user-friendly spreadsheet is provided to translate the generic experimental information to farm-specific conditions.

Keywords: partial budgeting; frontier analysis; pig finishing; strategic deworming

Published: October 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Van Meensel J, Kanora A, Lauwers L, Jourquin J, Goossens L, Van Huylenbroeck G. From research to farm: ex ante evaluation of strategic deworming in pig finishing. Vet Med - Czech. 2010;55(10):483-493. doi: 10.17221/2940-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977): Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production func
  2. Beloeil PA, Chauvin C, Fablet C, Jolly JP, Eveno E, Madec F, Reperant JM (2003): Helminth control practices and infections in growing pigs in France. Livestock Production Science 81, 99-104. Go to original source...
  3. Bouwkamp FT, Geudeke MJ, De Jong MF, Van De Ven SCG (2006): Comparison of fattening farms with and without respiratory problems and poor technical results: a case control study. IPVS 2006, Proceedings vol I, 130.
  4. Bravo-Ureta BE, Rieger L (1991): Dairy farm efficiency measurement using stochastic frontiers and neoclassical duality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 421-428. Go to original source...
  5. Caballero-HernAndez AI, CastrejOn-Pineda F, Martinez-Gamba R, Angeles-Campos S, PErez-Rojas M, Buntinx SE (2004): Survival and viability of Ascaris suum and Oesophagostomum dentatum in ensiled swine faeces. Bioresource Technology 94, 137-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O'Donnell CJ, Battese G (2005): An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer, New York. 349 pp.
  7. Coelli T, Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck G (2007): Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. Journal of Productivity Analysis 28, 3-12. Go to original source...
  8. Corwin RM (1997): Economics of gastrointestinal parasitism of cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 451-460. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Dalsted NL, Gutierrez PH (1992): Partial Budgeting. Report No. 3.760. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, 5 pp.
  10. Dijkhuizen AA, Morris RS (1997): Animal Health Economics: Principles and Applications. University of Sydney, 306 pp.
  11. Farrell MJ (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 253-281. Go to original source...
  12. Forsum E, Nesheim MC, Crompton DWT (1981): Nutritional aspects of Ascaris infection in young proteindeficient pigs. Parasitology 83, 497. Go to original source...
  13. Greene WH (1993): The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds.): The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press. 68-119. Go to original source...
  14. Hale OM, Stewart TB, Marti OG (1985): Influence of an experimental infection of Ascaris suum on performance of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 60, 220-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Helwigh AB, Christensen CM, Roepstorff A, Nansen P (1999): Concurrent Ascaris suum and Oesophagostomum dentatum infections in pigs. Veterinary Parasitology 82, 221-234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Huppes G, Ishikawa M (2005): Eco-efficiency and its terminology. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9, 43-46. Go to original source...
  17. Jaeger M, Gauly M, Bauer C, Failing K, Erhardt G, Zahner H (2005): Endoparasites in calves of beef cattle herds: management systems dependent and genetic influences. Veterinary Parasitology 131, 173-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. JAH (2004): Economic Benefits of Strategic Deworming. Janssen Animal Health. 31 p.
  19. Joachim A, Duhmer M, Daugschies A, Roepstorff A (2001): Occurrence of helminths in pig fattening units with different management systems in Northern Germany. Veterinary Parasitology 96, 135-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kanora A (2009): Effect on productivity of treating fattening pigs every 5 weeks with flubendazole in feed. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 78, 170-175. Go to original source...
  21. Kanora A, Rochette F, Vlaeminck K, Goossens L (2004): Economic appraisal of the treatment regime with Flubenol® 5% medicated feed every 5 weeks on fattening pigs. IPVS 2004, Proceedings, Vol. II, 582.
  22. Kemper N, Henze C (2009): Effects of pastures' re-wetting on endoparasites in cattle in northern Germany. Veterinary Parasitology 161, 302-306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2000): Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press. 348 pp. Go to original source...
  24. Nansen P, Roepstorff A (1999): Parasitic helminths of the pig: factors influencing transmission and infection levels. International Journal of Parasitology 29, 877-891. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Roepstorff A, Jorsal SE (1989): Prevalence of helminth infections in swine in Denmark. Veterinary Parasitology 33, 231-239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Roepstorff A, Nansen P (1994): Epidemiology and control of helminth infections in pigs under intensive and non-intensive production systems. Veterinary Parasitology 54, 69-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Sharma KR, Leung P, Zaleski HM (1999): Technical, allocative and economic efficiencies in swine production in Hawaii: a comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches. Agricultural Economics 20, 23-35. Go to original source...
  28. Stephenson LS, Pond WG, Nesheim MC, Krook LP, Crompton DWT (1980): Ascaris suum: nutrient absorption, growth and intestinal pathology in young pigs experimentally infected with 15-day-old larvae. Experimental Parasitology 49, 15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Stewart TB, Hale OM (1988): Losses to internal parasites in swine production. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1548-1554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Urquhart GM, Armour J, Duncan JL, Dunn AM, Jennings FW (1999): Veterinary Parasitology. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford., 307 pp.
  31. Van Meirhaeghe P, Maes L (1996): Effect of strategic
  32. Lauwers L (2009): Justifying the incorporation of the ma- deworming with flubendazole on the incidence of Asterials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models. Ecological Economics 68, 1605-1614. caris liver lesions in fattening pigs. IPVS 1996, Proceedings, 353. Go to original source...
  33. Lauwers L, de Mey Y, Wauters E, Van Meensel J, Van van Wagenberg CPA, Backus GBC, Kuiper WE, van der Passel S, Vancauteren M (2009): De volatiliteit van het landbouwinkomen in Vlaanderen. Mededeling ILVO No.68, Instituut voor Landbouw- en Visserijonderzoek. http://publicaties.vlaanderen.be/docfolder/
  34. Vorst JGAJ, Urlings HAP (2009): Incentive mechanisms for liver lesion control in finishing pigs in the
  35. Netherlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 93, 19-24. 16426/ILVOmededeling68Risico.pdf Vercruysse J, Dorny P (1999): Integrated control of nem
  36. Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977): Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18, 435-444. Go to original source...
  37. Murrell KD (1986): Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of major swine helminth parasites. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice 2, 439-454. atode infections in cattle: a reality? a need? a future? International Journal of Parasitology 29, 165-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Wagner B, Polley L (1997): Ascaris suum prevalence and intensity: an abattoir survey of market hogs in Saskatchewan. Veterinary Parasitology 73, 309-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Williams JC (1997): Anthelmintic treatment strategies: current and future. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 461-477. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.