Vet Med - Czech, 2012, 57(6):300-307 | DOI: 10.17221/6017-VETMED

Palatability of different concentrations of a liquid nutritional supplement in healthy cats and dogs of different ages and breeds

A. Verbrugghe, G.P.J. Janssens, M. Hesta
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

Hypo- and anorexia are the most commonly presented complaints for many diseases in veterinary medicine, leading to malnutrition, immunosuppression, compromised wound healing and altered drug metabolism. Stimulating appetite and palatability are therefore important factors in managing anorectic pets. The palatability of a liquid nutritional supplement for cats (LNScat) and dogs (LNSdog), which can be added to the diet as appetite stimulant, was evaluated in healthy pets. In total, 60 cats and 60 dogs of different ages and breeds were included in the study. Acceptance tests were performed using LNS with a concentration of 100% (LNS100) and preferences of water and three different concentrations of LNS (LNS50, LNS70, LNS100) were tested using a traditional two-pan preference test. Acceptance tests with LNS100 showed that cats and dogs generally accepted LNS very well. In dogs, a weak positive correlation existed between acceptance and age, whereas in cats no correlation with age was observed. Furthermore, preference tests showed a clear preference for LNS, regardless of dilution (LNS50, LNS70 and LNS100), when compared to water. In cats, LNS100 was generally better accepted than LNS50 and LNS70. Dogs preferred LNS70 and LNS100 to LNS50. The present study demonstrated that LNS is highly palatable for healthy dogs and cats. If future research confirms that LNS is also highly palatable for ill and hospitalised patients and stimulates appetite in a hospital setting, a practical tool to improve moisture and nutrient intake in patients with hypo- or anorexia will become available.

Keywords: acceptance test; cat; dog; liquid supplement; traditional two-pan preference test

Published: June 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Verbrugghe A, Janssens GPJ, Hesta M. Palatability of different concentrations of a liquid nutritional supplement in healthy cats and dogs of different ages and breeds. Vet Med - Czech. 2012;57(6):300-307. doi: 10.17221/6017-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Araujo JA, Milgram NW (2004): A novel cognitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2200-2206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Araujo JA, Studzinski CM, Larson BT, Milgram NW (2004): Comparison of the cognitive palatability assessment protocol and the two-pan test for use in assessing palatability of two similar foods in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65, 1490-1496. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bradshaw JWS (2006): The evolutionary basis for the feeding behaviour of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus). Journal of Nutrition 136, 1927S- 1931S. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chan D (2009): The inappetent hospitalised cat. Clincal approach to maximising nutritional support. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 11, 925-933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Chan DL, Freeman LM (2006): Nutrition in critical illness. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice 36, 1225-1241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Delaney SJ (2006): Management of anorexia in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice 36, 1243-1249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L (1984): Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science 226, 1441-1443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Griep MI, Mets TF, Vercruysse A, Cromphout I, Ponjaert I, Toft J, Massart DL (1995): Food odor thresholds in relation to age, nutritional, and health-status. Journals of Gerontology Series A - Biological Science 50, B407-B414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Griep MI, Mets TF, Collys K, Vogelaere P, Laska M, Massart DL (1997a): Odour perception in relation to age, general health, anthropometry and dental state. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 25, 263-275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Griffin RW, Scott GC, Cante CJ (1984): Food preferences of dogs housed in testing-kennels and in consumers' homes: some comparisons. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 8, 253-259. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Li X, Li W, Wang H, Cao J, Maehashi K, Huang L, Bachmanov AA, Reeds DR, Legrand-Defretin V, Beauchamp GK, Brand JG (2005): Pseudogenization of a sweet-receptor gene accounts for cats' indifference toward sugar. PloS Genetics 1, 27-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Li X, Li W, Wang H, Bayley DL, Cao J, Reeds DR, Bachmanov AA, Huang L, Legrand-Defretin V, Beauchamp GK, Brand JG (2006): Cats lack sweet taste receptor. Journal of Nutrition 136, 1932S-1934S. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Michel KE (2006): Unconventional diets for dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice 36, 1269-1281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. National Research Council (NRC) (2006a): Chapter 15, Nutrient requirements and dietary nutrient recommendations. In: Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 354-370.
  15. National Research Council (NRC) (2006b): Chapter 3, Energy. In: Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 28-48.
  16. Rashotte ME, Foster DF, Austin T (1984): Two-pan and operant lever-press tests of dogs' preference for various foods. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 8, 231-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Remillard RL (2002): Nutritional support in critical care patients. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice 32, 1145-1164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Remillard RL (2008): Homemade diets: Attributes, pitfalls and a call for action. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine 23, 137-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Steinbach S, Staudenmaier R, Hummel T, Arnold W (2008): Loss of olfaction with aging: a frequent disorder receiving little attention (in German). Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 41, 394-402. Go to PubMed...
  20. Sunday SR, Sanders SA, Collier G (1983): Palatability and meal patterns. Physiology and Behavior 30, 915-918. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Verbrugghe A, Hesta M, Gulbrandson KE, Janssens GPJ (2007): The effect of salmon oil freshness on the palatability of dog foods. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 76, 201-207. Go to original source...
  22. Wysocki CJ, Gilbert AN (1989): National geographic smell survey - Effects of age are heterogenous. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 561, 12-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.