Vet Med - Czech, 2017, 62(7):377-385 | DOI: 10.17221/127/2016-VETMED

Effects of pelvis rotation on the projected radiographic position of the femoral head in relationship to the acetabulumOriginal Paper

J. Martins*,1, B. Colaço1,2, S. Alves-Pimenta1,2, A. Ferreira3, M. Ginja1,4
1 Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
2 Department of Animal Science; University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
4 Department of Veterinary Science, University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal

The aim of this study was to describe the influence of pelvis rotation on the projected radiographic position of the femoral head in relationship to the acetabulum in the standard ventrodorsal hip extended view, i.e. Norberg angle, pelvic thickness at the level of the cranial effective acetabular rim, femoral head subluxation index, femoral head subluxation category and femoral head-acetabular distance. Twelve adult dogs of large and giant breeds were radiographed in standard hip extended view and with 2°, 4° and 6° of rotation on the right and left sides. Norberg angle, pelvic thickness, subluxation index, subluxation category and femoral head-acetabular distance were measured on radiographs and analysed comparing a normal position with positions of different degrees of rotation for the dependent and non-dependent side. All the studied parameters showed adequate repeatability. Norberg angle and femoral head-acetabular distance did not show significant mean differences in all degrees of rotated pelvis (P > 0.05). The pelvic thickness showed an increase with the degree of rotation on the dependent side (P < 0.05) and a slight decrease on the non-dependent side (P > 0.05). The subluxation index and subluxation category showed an increase with the degree of rotation on the dependent side and a decrease on the non-dependent side (P < 0.05). As the subluxation index and subluxation category are parameters used in the classification of the main international hip dysplasia scoring systems, pelvic rotation can impair the final hip score, especially in scoring systems that are based on the worst joint.

Keywords: femoral head-acetabular distance; Norberg angle; pelvic thickness; subluxation categories; subluxation index

Published: July 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martins J, Colaço B, Alves-Pimenta S, Ferreira A, Ginja M. Effects of pelvis rotation on the projected radiographic position of the femoral head in relationship to the acetabulum. Vet Med - Czech. 2017;62(7):377-385. doi: 10.17221/127/2016-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Adams WM, Dueland RT, Daniels R, Fialkowski J, Nordheim EV (2000): Comparison of two palpation, four radiographic and three ultrasound methods for early detection of mild to moderate canine hip dysplasia. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 41, 484-490. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Andronescu A, Kelly L, Kearney MT, Lopez MJ (2015): Associations between early radiographic and computed tomographic measures and canine hip joint osteoarthritis and maturity. American Journal of Veterinary Research 76, 19-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bausman JA, Wendelburg KL (2010): Evaluation of the effect of pelvic tilt in the coronal plane on the Norberg angle measured in ventrodorsal radiographic views of a canine hip joint bone model. American Journal of Veterinary Research 71, 1348-1353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chalmers HJ, Nykamp SN, Lerer A (2013): The Ontario Veterinary College Hip Certification Program - Assessing inter- and intra-observer repeatability and comparison of findings to those of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. Canadian Veterinary Journal 54, 42-46. Go to original source...
  5. Comhaire FH, Criel AC, Dassy CA, Guevar PG, Snaps FR (2009): Precision, reproducibility, and clinical usefulness of measuring the Norberg angle by means of computerized image analysis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 70, 228-235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Culp WTN, Kapatkin AS, Gregor TP, Powers MY, McKelvie PJ, Smith GK (2006): Evaluation of the Norberg angle threshold: A comparison of Norberg angle and distraction index as measures of coxofemoral degenerative joint disease susceptibility in seven breeds of dogs. Veterinary Surgery 35, 453-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dennis R (2012): Interpretation and use of BVA/KC hip scores in dogs. In Practice 34, 178-194. Go to original source...
  8. Fluckiger M (1995): The standardised analysis of radiographs for hip dysplasia in dogs. Objectifying a subjective process. The European Journal of Companion Animal Practice 5, 39-44.
  9. Fluckiger MA, Friedrich GA, Binder H (1999): A radiographic stress technique for evaluation of coxofemoral joint laxity in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 28, 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Genevois JP, Cachon T, Fau D, Carozzo C, Viguier E, Collard F, Remy D (2007): Canine hip dysplasia radiographic screening. Prevalence of rotation of the pelvis along its length axis in 7,012 conventional hip extended radiographs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 20, 296-298. Go to original source...
  11. Gibbs C (1997): The BVA/KC scoring scheme for control of hip dysplasia: interpretation of criteria. Veterinary Record 13, 275-284.
  12. Ginja MM, Ferreira AJ, Silvestre M, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Llorens-Pena MP (2006): Repeatability and reproducibility of distraction indices in PennHIP examinations of the hip joint in dogs. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 54, 387- 392. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ginja MMD, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Melo-Pinto P, Bulas-Cruz J, Orden MA, San-Roman F, Llorens-Pena MP, Ferreira AJA (2008): Early hip laxity examination in predicting moderate and severe hip dysplasia in Estrela mountain dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 49, 641-646. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ginja MMD, Ferreira AJ, Jesus SS, Melo-Pinto P, Bulas-Cruz J, Orden MA, San-Roman F, Llorens-Pena P, GonzaloOrden JM (2009): comparison of clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging methods for early prediction of canine hip laxity and dysplasia. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 50, 135-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ginja MMD, Silvestre AM, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Ferreira AJ (2010): Diagnosis, genetic control and preventive management of canine hip dysplasia: a review. Veterinary Journal 184, 269-276. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ginja M, Gaspar AR, Ginja C (2015): Emerging insight into the genetic basis of canine hip dysplasia. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports 6, 193-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Gold RM, Gregor TP, Huck JL, McKelvie PJ, Smith GK (2009): Effects of osteoarthritis on radiographic measures of laxity and congruence in hip joints of Labrador Retrievers. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 235, 1549-1554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Janssens L, De Ridder M, Verhoeven G, Gielen I, van Bree H (2013): Comparing Norberg angle, linear femoral overlap and surface femoral overlap in radiographic assessment of the canine hip joint. Journal of Small Animal Practice 55, 135-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Lust G, Todhunter RJ, Hollis NE, Dykes NL, Williams AJ, Burton-Wuster NI, Farese JP (2001): Comparison of three radiographic methods for diagnosis of hip dysplasia in eight-month-old dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 219, 1242-1246. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Martins J, Ferreira AJ, Ginja MM (2012): Morphometric assessment of the hip joint in the Estrela mountain dog breed. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 25, 202-210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Martins J, Colaço BJ, Ferreira AJ, Ginja MM (2016): Analysis of pelvic rotation on the standard hip ventrodorsal extended radiographic view. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 29, 68-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Ohlerth S, Lang J, Busato A, Gaillard C (2001): Estimation of genetic population variables for six radiographic criteria of hip dysplasia in a colony of Labrador retrievers. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62, 846-852. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Skurkova L, Hluchy M, Lackova M, Mihalova M, Ledecky V (2010): Relation of the Norberg angle and the position of the femoral head centre to the dorsal acetabular edge in the evaluation of canine hip dysplasia. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 23, 433-438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Smith GK, Lawler DF, Biery DN, Powers MY, Shofer F, Gregor TP, Karbe GT, McDonald-Lynch MB, Evans RH, Kealy RD (2012): Chronology of hip dysplasia development in a cohort of 48 Labrador Retrievers followed for life. Veterinary Surgery 41, 20-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Thompson R, Roe SC, Robertson ID (2007): Effects of pelvic positioning and simulated dorsal acetabular rim remodeling on the radiographic shape of the dorsal acetabular edge. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 48, 8-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Tomlinson JL, Johnson JC (2000): Quantification of measurement of femoral head coverage and Norberg angle within and among four breeds of dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 61, 1492-1500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Vandekerckhove PMFP, Janssens LAA, Ballieu BCW (2003): The influence of epidural anesthesia on femoral overlap and Norberg angle in the hip joint of young dysplastic dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 16, 127-131. Go to original source...
  28. Verhoeven G, Coopman F, Duchateau L, Saunders JH, van Rijssen B, van Bree H (2007): Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia using the standard ventrodorsal hip extended radiographic method. Journal of Small Animal Practice 48, 387-393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Verhoeven G, Fortrie RR, Duchateau L, Saunders JH, Van Ryssen B, Van Bree H, Coopman F (2010): The effect of a technical quality assessment of Hip-extended radiographs on interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip Dysplasia. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 51, 498-503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Volta A, Piccionello AP, Salvaggio A, Dini F, Bonnazzi M, Manfredi S, Tambella AM, Gnudi G (2013): Effect of pelvic inclination and torsional deformity on canine acetabular morphology with computed tomography. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology 26, 440-444. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.