Vet Med - Czech, 2018, 63(2):81-86 | DOI: 10.17221/115/2017-VETMED

Restrainer exposure to scatter radiation in practical small animal radiography measured using thermoluminescent dosimetersOriginal Paper

H. Oh1, S. Sung1, S. Lim1, Y. Jung2, Y. Cho3, K. Lee*,1
1 College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea
2 Research Promotion Team, Office of Research Management, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3 College of Health Sciences, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea

This study was aimed at estimating restrainer exposure to scatter radiation in veterinary radiography using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in different positions, and at different anatomic regions. A prospective study was conducted to measure exposure dose of two restrainers: A (cathode side) and B (anode side), and an observer C (at a 1-meter distance from the X-ray table) over two months. Protective devices included panorama mask, thyroid shield and arm shield. TLDs were placed on the inside and outside of the protective gear at five different anatomic sites (eye, thyroid, breast, gonad and arm). The study data consisted of 778 exposures, 82 patients (78 dogs, four cats), a mean kVp of 58.7 and a mean mAs of 11.4. The doses (outside the shield/inside the shield, in mSv) measured by restrainers A, B and C were eye (3.04/0.42), (2.29/0.17), (0.55/0.01), thyroid (2.93/0.01), (1.97/0.01), (0.19/0.01), breast (1.01/0.04), (0.73/0.01), (0.32/0.01), gonad (0.07/0.01), (0.01/0.01), (0.16/0.01) and arm (2.81/1.43), (1.17/0.01), (0.08/0.01), respectively. This study describes the extent of occupational radiation exposure in small animal radiography. The exposure dose for eyes outside lead protection showed the highest value in all participants. With lead protection, the reduction in the exposure dose of eyes was significant (A: 86%, B: 93%, C: 98%), and the highest reduction was 99% in the thyroid region. These results suggest the necessity of radiation shields in manual restraint, particularly for eye protection.

Keywords: veterinary radiography; thermoluminescent dosimeter; radiation exposure; eye protection

Published: February 28, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Oh H, Sung S, Lim S, Jung Y, Cho Y, Lee K. Restrainer exposure to scatter radiation in practical small animal radiography measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Vet Med - Czech. 2018;63(2):81-86. doi: 10.17221/115/2017-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Barber J, McNulty JP (2012): Investigation into scatter radiation dose levels received by a restrainer in small animal radiography. Journal of Small Animal Practice 53, 578- 585. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Canato GR, Drumond LF, Paschuk SA, Asfora VK, Andrade MEA, Denyak V, Schelin HR (2014): Occupational exposure assessment in procedures of portable digital veterinary radiology for small size animals. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 95, 284-287. Go to original source...
  3. Dendy PP, Heaton B (2011): 12. Radiobiology and generic radiation risks. In: Dendy PP, Heaton B (eds): Physics for Diagnostic Radiology. 3rd edn. CRC Press. 397-426. Go to original source...
  4. Hausler U, Czarwinski R, Brix G (2009): Radiation exposure of medical staff from interventional x-ray procedures: a multicentre study. European Radiology 19, 2000-2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Lindell B (1996): The risk philosophy of radiation protection. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68, 157-163. Go to original source...
  6. Martin CJ (2009): A review of radiology staff doses and dose monitoring requirements. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 136, 140-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Merriam GR, Worgul BV (1983): Experimental radiation cataract - its clinical relevance. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 59, 372-392.
  8. Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ, Abbara S (2000): Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 214, 121-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Olgar T, Bor D, Berkmen G, Yazar T (2009): Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations. Journal of Radiological Protection 29, 393-407. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Seifert H, Luepke M, Niehaus H, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2007): Radiation exposure of the pet owner during standardised X-ray diagnostic examinations of dogs and cats. Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift 120, 251-259.
  11. Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M, Gingold E, Goldman L, Krugh K, Leong DL, Mah E, Ogden K, Peck D, Samei E, Wang J, Willis CE (2009): An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Medical Physics 36, 2898-2914. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, MacVittie TJ, Aleman BM, Edgar AB, Mabuchi K, Muirhead CR, Shore RE, Wallace WH (2012): ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs-threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Annals of the ICRP 41, 1-322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ (2008): Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248, 945-953. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA (1994): Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 5, 71-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Williams JR (1997): The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology. The British Journal of Radiology 70, 498-503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.