Vet Med - Czech, 2019, 64(1):18-24 | DOI: 10.17221/18/2018-VETMED

Evaluation of the efficiency of the C-ring aiming guide for atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogsOriginal Paper

Ji Young Park, Young Rak Kim, Ho Jung Choi, Young Won Lee, Seong Mok Jeong, Hae Beom Lee*
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the C-ring aiming guide for the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique in toy breed dogs. Twenty-one adult canine cadavers of toy breed dogs were used in this study. The left and right sides of the cervical vertebrae were randomly assigned to two implant insertion groups: a C-ring aiming guide group and a drill guide group. A 1.2-mm Kirschner wire was inserted into each side by using either a C-ring aiming guide or a drill guide. CT scans were performed before and after surgery. The optimal safe implantation corridor angle and length, the implant insertion angle and length, the implant insertion time and the proportion of the insertion corridor to the optimal corridor were evaluated. Violations to the alar foramen and the vertebral canal also were evaluated. The implant insertion time was twice as long as that observed in the aiming guide group (P < 0.05). The proportion of the insertion angle and length to the optimal angle were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05). With respect to precision, there was a trend toward less variability in the aiming guide group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.09). The violation of the alar foramen was significantly lower in the aiming guide group than in the drill guide group (P < 0.05). Violation to the vertebral canal was detected in one cadaver in the drill guide group but did not occur in the aiming guide group. The use of a C-ring aiming guide was associated with less damage to the alar foramen and the vertebral canal during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogs.

Keywords: atlantoaxial instability; ventral stabilisation technique; vertebral foramen; cadaver; Kirchner wire

Published: January 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Park JY, Kim YR, Choi HJ, Lee YW, Jeong SM, Lee HB. Evaluation of the efficiency of the C-ring aiming guide for atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogs. Vet Med - Czech. 2019;64(1):18-24. doi: 10.17221/18/2018-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Aikawa T, Shibata M, Fujita H (2013): Modified ventral stabilization using positively threaded profile pins and polymethylmethacrylate for atlantoaxial instability in 49 dogs. Veterinary Surgery 42, 683-692. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Beaver DP, Ellison GW, Lewis DD, Goring RL, Kubilis PS, Barchard C (2000): Risk factors affecting the outcome of surgery for atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: 46 cases (1978-1998). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 216, 1104-1109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Hettlich BF, Allen MJ, Pascetta D, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS (2013): Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column. Veterinary Surgery 42, 693-700. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Jeserevics J, Srenk P, Beranek J, Jaggy A, Touru S, Cizinauskas S (2008): Stabilisation of atlantoaxial subluxation in the dog through ventral arthrodesis. Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 150, 69-76. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kazan S, Yildirim F, Sindel M, Tuncer R (2000): Anatomical evaluation of the groove for the vertebral artery in the axis vertebrae for atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation technique. Clinical Anatomy 13, 237-243. Go to original source...
  6. Kieves NR, Lotsikas PJ, Schulz KS, Canapp SO (2014): Hip toggle stabilization using the TightRope® system in 17 dogs: Technique and long-term outcome. Veterinary Surgery 43, 515-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Leblond G, Gaitero L, Moens NM, Lin den A, James FM, Monteith G, Runciman J (2016): Canine atlantoaxial optimal safe implantation corridors - description and validation of a novel 3D presurgical planning method using OsiriX™. BMC Veterinary Research 12, 188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Platt SR, Chambers JN, Cross A (2004): A modified ventral fixation for surgical management of atlantoaxial subluxation in 19 dogs. Veterinary Surgery 33, 349-354. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Plessas IN, Volk HA (2014): Signalment, clinical signs and treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: a systematic review of 336 published cases from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 28, 948.
  10. Thomas WB, Sorjonen DC, Simpson ST (1991): Surgical management of atlantoaxial subluxation in 23 dogs. Veterinary Surgery 20, 409. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Vizcaino Reves N, Stahl C, Stoffel M, Bali M, Forterre F (2013): CT scan based determination of optimal bone corridor for atlantoaxial ventral screw fixation in miniature breed dogs. Veterinary Surgery 42, 819-824. Go to original source...
  12. Warren-Smith CMR, Kneissl S, Benigni L, Kenny RJ, Lamb CR (2009): Incomplete ossification of the atlas in dogs with cervical signs. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 50, 635-638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.