Vet Med - Czech, 2019, 64(2):51-59 | DOI: 10.17221/122/2018-VETMED

Evaluation of colostrum quality in the Czech Republic using radial immunodiffusion and different types of refractometersOriginal Paper

Alena Pechova1, Sona Slosarkova*,2, Stanislav Stanek3, Eliska Nejedla3, Petr Fleischer2
1 Department of Animal Protection, Welfare and Behaviour, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Livestock Technology and Management, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic

The objectives of this study were to determine the immunoglobulin G concentration of colostrum in Czech dairy cows, to compare refractometer results with results achieved using the radial immunodiffusion method and to evaluate the reliability of three types of refractometers and recommend the best solution for the evaluation of colostrum quality. Colostrum samples (n = 1522) were collected from 38 herds between 2015 and 2017. The immunological quality of colostrum was estimated using Brix refractometers (optical, simple digital, digital Misco) and compared with the immunoglobulin G concentration assessed using radial immunodiffusion. We found high variability in the quality of colostrum. The minimum, maximum and median of individual measurements were the following: radial immunodiffusion immunoglobulin G - 5.2, 199.1, 76.9 g/l; optical refractometer - 9.5, 32.0, 23.1% Brix; simple digital refractometer - 5.4, 35.0, 19.1% Brix; digital refractometer Misco - 9.8, 37.4, 23.2% Brix. On the basis of immunoglobulin G concentration assessed using radial immunodiffusion, 20.9% of colostrum samples were of low quality (immunoglobulin G < 50 g/l). The Spearman correlation coefficients between radial immunodiffusion and the Brix refractometer readings were 0.62-0.67 (P < 0.001) according to the type of refractometer. The cut-off evaluation of the readings from optical and Misco digital refractometers both showed 20% Brix, with sensitivities of 89.4% and 88.2%, specificities of 73.2% and 74.5% and accuracies of 86.0% and 85.4%, respectively. The cut-off level for the simple digital refractometer showed 17% Brix with a sensitivity of 77.5%, specificity of 80.4% and an insufficient accuracy of 78.1%. For optical and Misco refractometers we recommend the use of two cut-off levels for the evaluation of colostrum: 23% Brix for the selection of good quality colostrum suitable for freezing and 19% Brix to discard poor quality colostrum. The different cut-off levels obtained by measuring with different types of refractometers indicate the need to check the quality of the instruments prior to their use in practice and, where appropriate, to determine their cut-off levels by comparison with results obtained using the reference method.

Keywords: accuracy; Brix refractometers; colostrum; cut-off levels; dairy cow; immunoglobulin G concentration

Published: February 28, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pechova A, Slosarkova S, Stanek S, Nejedla E, Fleischer P. Evaluation of colostrum quality in the Czech Republic using radial immunodiffusion and different types of refractometers. Vet Med - Czech. 2019;64(2):51-59. doi: 10.17221/122/2018-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Bartens MC, Drillich M, Rychli K, Iwersen M, Arnholdt T, Meyer L, Klein-Jobstl D (2016): Assessment of different methods to estimate bovine colostrum quality on farm. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 64, 263-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bartier AL, Windeyer MC, Doepel L (2015): Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 1878-1884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Beam AL, Lombard JE, Kopral CA, Garber LP, Winter AL, Hicks JA, Schalter JL (2009): Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3973-3980. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bielmann V, Gillan J, Perkins NR, Skidmore AL, Godden S, Leslie KE (2010): An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3713-3721. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Buczinski S, Vandeweerd JM (2016): Diagnostic accuracy of refractometry for assessing bovine colostrum quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 7381-7394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Calloway CD, Tyler JW, Tessman RK, Holstetler D, Holle J (2002): Comparison of refractometers and test endpoints in the measurement of serum protein concentration to assess passive transfer status in calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 221, 1605-1608. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Chigerwe M, Tyler JW, Middleton JR, Spain JN, Dill JS, Steevens BJ (2008): Comparison of four methods to assess colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 233, 761-766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. dos Santos G, da Silva JT, da Rocha Santos FH, Bittar CMM (2017): Nutritional and microbiological quality of bovine colostrum samples in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 46, 72-79. Go to original source...
  9. Elsohaby I, McClure JT, Cameron M, Heider LC, Keefe GP (2017): Rapid assessment of bovine colostrum quality: How reliable are transmission infrared spectroscopy and digital and optical refractometers? Journal of Dairy Science 100, 1427-1435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Godden S (2008): Colostrum management for dairy calves. Veterinary Clinics Food Animal Practice 24, 19-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gulliksen SM, Lie KI, Solverod L, Osteras O (2008): Risk factors associated with colostrum quality in Norwegian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 704-712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kehoe SI, Heinrichs AJ, Moody ML, Jones CM, Long MR (2011): Comparison of immunoglobulin G concentrations in primiparous and multiparous bovine colostrum. The Professional Animal Scientist 27, 176-180. Go to original source...
  13. Klein-Jobstl D, Arnholdt T, Sturmlechner F, Iwersen M, Drillich M (2015): Results of an online questionnaire to survey calf management practices on dairy cattle breeding farms in Austria and to estimate differences in disease incidences depending on farm structure and management practices. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 57, 44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Krejci J, Kudlackova H, Tesarik R, Gebauer J, Faldyna M, Slosarkova S (2016): Immunodiffusion test for immunoglobulins in cow colostrum (in Czech). Functional sample. Veterinary Research Institute, ISBN 978-80-86895-92-5.
  15. Lokke MM, Engelbrecht R, Wiking L (2016): Covariance structures of fat and protein influence the estimation of IgG in bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Research 83, 58-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. McGuirk SM, Collins M (2004): Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Veterinary Clinics Food Animal Practice 20, 593-603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Mercaldo ND, Lau KF, Zhou XH (2007): Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 26, 2170-2183. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Moore M, Tyler JV, Chigerwe M, Dawes ME, Middleton JR (2005): Effect of delayed colostrum collection on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226, 1375-1377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Morrill KM, Conrad E, Lago A, Campbell J, Quigley J, Tyler H (2012a): Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3997-4005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Morrill KM, Conrad E, Polo J, Campbell J, Quigley J, Tyler H (2012b): Estimate of colostral immunoglobulin G concentration using refractometry without or with caprylic acid fractionation. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3987-3996. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Morrill KM, Robertson KE, Spring MM, Robinson AL, Tyler HD (2015): Validating a refractometer to evaluate immunoglobulin G concentration in Jersey colostrum and the effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on evaluating colostrum quality. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 595-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Pritchett LC, Gay CC, Besser TE, Hancock DD (1991): Management and production factors influencing immunoglobulin G1 concentration in colostrum from Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 2336-2341. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Quigley JD, Lago A, Chapman C, Erickson P, Polo J (2013): Evaluation of the Brix refractometer to estimate immunoglobulin G concentration in bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1148-1155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Rastani RR, Grummer RR, Bertics SJ, Gumen A, Wiltbank MC, Mashek DG, Schwab MC (2005): Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1004-1014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008): Youden index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of optimal cut-point estimated from observations affect ted by a lower limit of detection. Biometrical Journal 50, 419-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Stanek S, Zink V, Dolezal O, Stolc L (2014): Survey of preweaning dairy calf-rearing practices in Czech dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3973-3981. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Stewart S, Godden S, Bey R, Rapnicki P, Fetrow J, Farnsworth R, Scanlon M, Arnold Y, Clow L, Mueller K, Ferrouillet C (2005): Preventing bacterial contamination and proliferation during the harvest, storage, and feeding of fresh bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2571-2578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Tyler JW, Steevens BJ, Hostetler DE, Holle JM, Denbigh JL (1999): Colostral immunoglobulin concentrations in Holstein and Guernsey cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 60, 1136-1139. Go to original source...
  29. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture (2016): Dairy 2014: Dairy Cattle Management Practices in the United States (2014). Available at www.aphis.usda.gov/ animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy14/Dairy14_ dr_PartI.pdf (Accessed October 3, 2017).
  30. Weaver DM, Tyler JW, VanMetre DC, Hostetler DE, Barrington GM (2000): Passive transfer of colostral Immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 14, 569-577. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.