Vet Med - Czech, 2019, 64(6):260-265 | DOI: 10.17221/67/2018-VETMED

Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in dogs and at-risk humans in JordanOriginal Paper

Musa Alshehabat*,1, Mohammad Obaidat2, Wail Hayajneh3
1 Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
2 Department of Pathology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
3 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

Brucella canis infection is a neglected zoonotic disease and its seroprevalence in dogs and at-risk humans has not been previously studied in several countries including Jordan. The main aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence and identify risk factors of B. canis infection in police, breeding and stray dogs and in at-risk humans in Jordan. A total of 169 sera samples from apparently healthy dogs and 185 samples from apparently healthy people (85 from dog handlers and 100 from the general population) were tested in the study. Antibodies against B. canis were tested using the canine D-Tec® CB Rapid Slide Agglutination Test (RSAT) kit with secondary 2-mercaptoethanol (ME-RSAT). Overall, 8.3% of the dog sera samples tested positive to antibodies against B. canis, and 37.8% of stray dogs tested positive. Seroprevalence was higher in male dogs than in females. Furthermore, none of the tested human samples was positive to antibodies against B. canis. There was a significant association between seropositivity and the type of dog. The study reports preliminary findings that suggest the presence of B. canis among stray dogs in Jordan. Thus, preventive measures should be taken to control the transmission of this pathogen from stray dogs to other dogs and humans as well.

Keywords: Brucella; dogs; stray; breeding

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Alshehabat M, Obaidat M, Hayajneh W. Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in dogs and at-risk humans in Jordan. Vet Med - Czech. 2019;64(6):260-265. doi: 10.17221/67/2018-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Abarca VK, Lopez Del PJ, Pena DA, Lopez JC (2011): Pet ownership and health status of pets from immunocompromised children, with emphasis in zoonotic diseases. Revista Chilena de Infectologia 28, 205-210. Go to original source...
  2. Agudelo-Florez P, Castro B, Rojo-Ospina R, Henao-Villegas S (2012): Canine brucellosis: Seroprevalence and risk factors in pets from eleven neighbourhoods in Medellin, Colombia. Revista de Salud Publica 14, 644-656.
  3. Angel MO, Ristow P, Ko AI, Di-Lorenzo C (2012): Serological trail of Brucella infection in an urban slum population in Brazil. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 6, 675-679. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ayoola MC, Ogugua AJ, Akinseye VO, Joshua TO, Banuso MF, Adedoyin FJ, Adesokan KH, Omobolawe TO, Abiola JO, Otuh PI, Nottidge HO, Dale EJ, Perrett L, Taylor A, Stack J, Cadmus SIB (2016): Sero-epidemiological survey and risk factors associated with brucellosis in dogs in south-western Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal 23, doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.29.7794. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Behzadi MA, Mogheiseh A (2012): Epidemiological survey of Brucella canis infection in 7 different breeds of dogs in Fars Province, Iran. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 32, 234-236.
  6. Brower A, Okwumabua O, Massengill C, Muenks Q, Vanderloo P, Duster M, Homb K, Kurth K (2007): Investigation of the spread of Brucella canis via the U.S. interstate dog trade. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 11, 454-458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cadmus SIB, Adesokan HK, Ajala OO, Odetokun WO, Perrett LL, Stack JA (2011): Seroprevalence of Brucella abortus and B. canis in household dogs in southwestern Nigeria: A preliminary report. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 82, 56-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Carmichael LE, Zoha SJ, Flores-Castro R (1984): Problems in the serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis: dog responses to cell wall and internal antigens of Brucella canis. Developments in Biological Standardization 56, 371-383.
  9. Castrillon-Salazar L, Giraldo-Echeverri CA, Sanchez-Jimenez MM, Olivera-Angel M (2013): Factors associated with Brucella canis seropositivity in kennels of two regions of Antioquia, Colombia. Cadernos De Saúde Pública 29, 1955-1973. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Fernandes AR, de Azevedo SS, Pinheiro ES, Genovez ME, de Azevedo AS, de Sousa Batista AC, AlvesI CJ (2011): Brucella canis infection in dogs attended in veterinary clinics from patos, ParabaI BA state, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 42, 1405-1408. Go to original source...
  11. Gyuranecz M, Szeredi L, Ronai Z, Denes B, Dencso L, Dan A, Palmai N, Hauser Z (2011): Detection of Brucella canis-induced reproductive diseases in a kennel. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 23, 143-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Henderson RA, Hoerlein BF, Kramer TT, Meyer ME (1974): Discospondylitis in three dogs infected with Brucella canis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 165, 451-455.
  13. Kaden R, Agren J, Baverud V, Hallgren G, Ferrari S, Borjesson J, Lindberg M, Backman S, Wahab T (2014): Brucellosis outbreak in a Swedish kennel in 2013: determination of genetic markers for source tracing. Veterinary Microbiology 174, 523-530. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Krueger WS, Lucero NE, Brower A, Heil GL, Gray GC (2014): Evidence for unapparent Brucella canis infections among adults with occupational exposure to dogs. Zoonoses and Public Health 61, 509-518. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Lucero NE, Corazza R, Almuzara MN, Reynes E, Escobar GI, Boeri E, Ayala SM (2010): Human Brucella canis outbreak linked to infection in dogs. Epidemiology and Infection 138, 280-285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lucero NE, Escobar GI, Ayala SM, Lopez G (2002): Sensitivity and specificity of an indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay for the diagnosis of Brucella canis infection in dogs. Journal of Medical Microbiology 51, 656-660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Marzetti S, Carranza C, Roncallo M, Escobar GI, Lucero NE (2013): Recent trends in human Brucella canis infection. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 36, 55-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Musallam II, Abo-Shehada M, Omar M, Guitian J (2015): Cross-sectional study of brucellosis in Jordan: Prevalence, risk factors and spatial distribution in small ruminants and cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118, 387-396. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Osoro EM, Munyua P, Omulo S, Ogola E, Ade F, Mbatha P, Mbabu M, Ng'ang'a Z, Kairu S, Maritim M, Thumbi SM, Bitek A, Gaichugi S, Rubin C, Njenga K, Guerra M (2015): Strong association between human and animal brucella seropositivity in a linked study in Kenya, 2012-2013. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 93, 224-231.
  20. Poester FP, Goncalves VS, Lage AP (2002): Brucellosis in Brazil. Veterinary Microbiology 90, 55-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Sayan M, Erdenlig S, Stack J, Kilic S, Guducuoglu H, Aksoy Y, Baklan A, Etiler N (2011): A Serological diagnostic survey for Brucella canis infection in Turkish patients with brucellosis-like symptoms. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 64, 516-519. Go to original source...
  22. Wanke MM, Delpino MV, Baldi P (2002): Comparative performance of tests using cytosolic or outer membrane antigens of Brucella for the serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology 88, 367-375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Wanke M, Delpino M, Baldi P (2006): Use of enrofloxacin in the treatment of canine brucellosis in a dog kennel (clinical trial). Theriogenology 66, 1573-1578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.