Vet Med - Czech, 2019, 64(6):266-270 | DOI: 10.17221/141/2018-VETMED

Evaluation of radiation exposure from fluoroscopic examination in small animal veterinary staff using thermoluminescent dosimetersOriginal Paper

Jeongsu An1, Sohee Lim1, Seunghee Lee1, Hyeona Kim1, Kyungjun Min1, Youngkwon Cho2, Kichang Lee*,1
1 College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Iksan, Republic of Korea
2 College of Health Sciences, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occupational radiation exposure levels of veterinary staff during fluoroscopic examination using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). A prospective study was conducted to measure radiation doses in three positioned persons (two restrainers and one observer) using TLDs. The TLDs were placed on the inside and outside of the lead-equivalent protective devices of the panorama mask, thyroid shield, apron and arm shield. The TLDs were placed at five anatomic sites (eye, thyroid, breast, gonad and hand). Radiation exposure was measured in 65 fluoroscopic examinations at 80 kVp and 100 mAs. The doses (mSv) (outside/inside the shield) measured in restrainers A and B and observer C were 3.09/0.59, 3.80/0.65 and 0.63/0.44 in the eye; 2.20/0.73, 1.88/1.10 and 0.79/0.45 in the thyroid; 3.42/0.44, 3.94/2.35 and 0.61/0.34 in the breast; 1.84/0.45, 1.69/0.23 and 0.46/0.36 in the gonad; and 5.56/3.16, 8.29/2.99 and 0.79/0.34 in the hand, respectively. Out of all the lead protection devices, the radiation dose of the hand was the highest in all three participants, with the thyroid radiation dose value being the same as the hand in the observer C. Radiation doses received by the eyes of all three participants were also not negligible. Veterinary workers exposed to radiation through not only radiography but also fluoroscopy should wear protective gear, especially for the eyes.

Keywords: eye exposure; radiation exposure; thermoluminescent dosimeter; small animal; fluoroscopy

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
An J, Lim S, Lee S, Kim H, Min K, Cho Y, Lee K. Evaluation of radiation exposure from fluoroscopic examination in small animal veterinary staff using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Vet Med - Czech. 2019;64(6):266-270. doi: 10.17221/141/2018-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Barber J, McNulty JP (2012): Investigation into scatter radiation dose levels received by a restrainer in small animal radiography. Journal of Small Animal Practice 53, 578-585. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Canato GR, Drumond LF, Paschuk SA, Asfora VK, Andrade MEA, Denyak V, Schelin HR (2014): Occupational exposure assessment in procedures of portable digital veterinary radiology for small size animals. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 95, 284-287. Go to original source...
  3. Dendy PP, Heaton B (2011): Radiobiology and generic radiation risks. In: Dendy PP, Heaton B (eds): Physics for Diagnostic Radiology. 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 397-426 pp. Go to original source...
  4. Levine JS, Pollard RE, Marks SL (2014): Contrast videofluoroscopic assessment of dysphagic cats. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 55, 465-471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Lindell B (1996): The risk philosophy of radiation protection. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68, 157-163. Go to original source...
  6. Lopez PO, Dauer LT, Loose R, Martin CJ, Miller DL, Vano E, Doruff M, Padovani R, Massera G, Yoder C (2018): ICRP publication 139: Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures. Annals of the ICRP 47, 111-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Macready DM, Johnson LR, Pollard RE (2007): Fluoroscopic and radiographic evaluation of tracheal collapse in dogs: 62 cases (2001-2006). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 230, 1870-1876. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Mayer MN, Koehncke NK, Belotta AF, Cheveldae IT, Waldner CL (2018): Use of personal protective equipment in a radiology room at a veterinary teaching hospital. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 59, 137-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Merriam GR, Worgul BV (1983): Experimental radiation cataract - its clinical relevance. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 59, 372-392.
  10. Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ, Abbara S (2000): Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 214, 121-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Oh H, Sung S, Lim S, Jung Y, Cho Y, Lee K (2018): Restrainer exposure to scatter radiation in practical small animal radiography measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Veterinarni Medicina 63, 81-86. Go to original source...
  12. Pollard RE (2012): Imaging evaluation of dogs and cats with Dysphagia. International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Veterinary Science ISRN, doi: 10.5402/2012/238505. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, MacVittie TJ, Aleman BM, Edgar AB, Mabuchi K, Muirhead CR, Shore RE, Wallace WH (2012): ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs-threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Annals of the ICRP 41, 1-322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ (2008): Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248, 945-953. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA (1994): Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 5, 71-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.