Vet Med - Czech, 2004, 49(7):259-267 | DOI: 10.17221/5703-VETMED

Quantification of the effectiveness of laboratory diagnostics of rabies using classical and molecular-genetic methods

R. Franka, S. Svrcek, M. Madar, M. Kolesarova, A. Ondrejkova, R. Ondrejka, Z. Benisek, J. Suli, S. Vilcek
1 , S. S 1, M. M 1, M. K 2, A. O 3, R. O 3, Z. B
3 , J. S 3, S. V 3 1Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, University of Vererinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic 2Faculty of Natural Sciences, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic 3Department of Parasitology and Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine, Košice, Slovak Republic

In comparative experiments the diagnostic effectiveness of four methods of laboratory diagnostics of rabies - the mouse intracerebral inoculation test (MICIT, MIT), the rabies tissue culture infection test (RTCIT), the rapid rabies enzyme immune diagnosis test (RREID) and a molecular-genetic method, the nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR) - was quantified by the titration of serial dilutions of brain viral suspensions. The threshold value of the tests, i.e., the highest dilution of a specimen, which the method used is able to detect as a positive one, was determined. Further advantages and disadvantages of the tested methods were compared as well. Experimental optimization of procedures for RNA extraction was carried out and the optimum primer for RNA transcription to cDNA was selected. The RREID method was carried out in two variants: detection of the rabies antigen in a clarified (centrifugated) as well as in a non-clarified (noncentrifugated) brain suspension. In the experiments three autochthonous street isolates of rabies virus (in the form of primary isolates) were used; they had been isolated from naturally infected red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and a lynx (Lynx lynx). The results of comparative experiments revealed a relative correlation of the diagnostic effectiveness of standard methods (MICIT and RTCIT), with standard MICIT being the more sensitive one, RTCIT however having several other advantages (among others the speed of performance) and thus being preferred. For quantitative comparison of diagnostic effectiveness two other methods (RREID and nRT-PCR) were examined in that street isolates of rabies virus, which revealed the highest titer after titration by MICIT and RTCIT. The sensitivity of the RREID method proved to be rather low. If used with noncentrifugated brain suspensions this method may yield nonspecific reactions. If compared particularly with RREID the nRT-PCR is characterized by a considerably higher diagnostic effectiveness. The sensitivity of nRT-PCR is not affected by preliminary clarification of the brain suspension. The reverse primer N12 seems to be more suitable for transcription of the extracted RNA to cDNA than random hexamers.

Keywords: rabies; rabies virus (RABV); MICIT - mouse intracerebral inoculation test; MIT - mouse inoculation test; RTCIT - rabies tissue culture infection test; RREID - rapid rabies enzyme immune diagnostic test; nRT-PCR - nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Published: July 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Franka R, Svrcek S, Madar M, Kolesarova M, Ondrejkova A, Ondrejka R, et al.. Quantification of the effectiveness of laboratory diagnostics of rabies using classical and molecular-genetic methods. Vet Med - Czech. 2004;49(7):259-267. doi: 10.17221/5703-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Amengual B., Whitby J.E., King A., Serra Cobo J., Bourhy H. (1997): Evolution of European bat lyssaviruses. J. Gen. Virol., 78, 2319-2328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Barnard B.J.H., Voges S.F. (1982): A simple technique for the diagnosis of rabies in formalin-preserved brain. Ondersterpoort J. Vet. Res., 49, 193-194.
  3. Bourhy H., Perrin P. (1996): Rapid rabies enzyme immunodiagnosis (RREID) for rabies antigen detection. In: Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (eds.): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva. 105-112.
  4. Bourhy H., Sureau P. (1990): Laboratory methods for rabies diagnosis. Unite de la Rage, Commission des Laboratoires de référence et d´Expertise de l´Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. 197 pp.
  5. Bourhy H., Kissi B., Lafon M., Sacramento D., Tordo N. (1992): Antigenic and molecular characterization of bat rabies virus in Europe. J. Clin. Microbiol., 30, 2419-2426. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bourhy H., Kissi B., Tordo N. (1993): Molecular diversity of the lyssavirus genus. Virology, 194, 70-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Bourhy H., Bachir K., Audry L., Smreczak M., SadkowskaTodys M., Kulonen K., Tordo N., Zmudzinski J.F., Holmes E.C. (1999): Ecology and evolution of rabies virus in Europe. J. Gen. Virol., 80, 2545-2557. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Crepin P., Audry L., Rotivel Y., Gacoin A., Caroff C., Bourhy H. (1998): Intravitam diagnosis of human rabies by PCR using saliva and cerebrospinal fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36, 1117-1121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. David D., Yakobson B., Rotenberg D., Dveres N., Davidson I., Stram Y. (2002): Rabies virus detection by RTPCR in decomposed naturally infected brains. Vet. Microbiol., 87, 111-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Dean D.J., Abelseth M.K. (1973): The fluorescent antibody test. W.H.O. Monogr., Ser. 23, 73-84.
  11. Dean D.J., Abelseth M.K., Atanasiu P. (1996): The fluorescent antibody test. In: Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (eds.): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva. 88-95.
  12. Goldwasser R.A., Kissling R.E., Carski T.R., Hosty T.S. (1959): Fluorescent antibody staining of rabies virus antigens in the salivary glands of rabid animals. Bull. WHO, 20, 579-588.
  13. Gould A.R., Hya A.D., Lunt R., Ka enbelt J.A., Hengstberger S., Blacksell S.D. (1998): Characterisation of a novel lyssavirus isolated from pteropid bats in Australia. Virus. Res., 54, 165-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Heaton P.R., Johnstone P., McElhinney L.M., Cowley R., O'Sullivan E., Whitby J.E. (1997): Heminested PCR assay for detection of six genotypes of rabies and rabies-related viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol., 35, 2762- 2766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Holmes E.C., Woelk Ch.H., Kassis R., Bourhy H. (2002): Genetic constraints and the adaptive evolution of rabies virus in nature. Virology, 292, 247-257. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kissi B., Tordo N., Bourhy H. (1995): Genetic polymorphism in the rabies virus nucleoprotein gene. Virology, 209, 526-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Koprowski H. (1996): The mouse inoculation test. In: Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (eds.): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva. 80-87.
  18. Larghi O.P., Nebel A.E., Lazaro L., Savy V.L. (1975): Sensitivity of BHK-21 cells supplemented with diethylaminoethyl-dextran for detection of street rabies virus in saliva samples. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1, 243-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Meslin F.X., Stohr K. (1997): Prospects for immunization against rabies in developing countries. In: Dodet B., Meslin F.X. (eds.): Rabies Control in Asia. Elsevier, Paris. 15-18.
  20. Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (1996): Laboratory techniques in rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva.
  21. Negri A. (1903): Beitrag zum Studium der Aetiologie der Tollwut. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infekt. Hyg., 43, 507-528. Go to original source...
  22. OIE - Office International des Epizooties (2000): Manual of standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. 276-291.
  23. Ondrejka R., Durove A., Svrcek S., Benisek Z., Suliova J. (1997): Isolation and identification of lyssa virus strains (in Slovak). Vet. Med. - Czech, 42, 57-60. Go to PubMed...
  24. Ondrejkova A., Suli J., Ondrejka R., Benisek Z., Franka R., Svrcek S., Madar M., Bugarsky A. (2002): Comparison of the detection and quantification of rabies antibodies in sera. Vet. Med. - Czech, 47, 218-221. Go to original source...
  25. Perrin P., Rollin P.E., Sureau P. (1986): A rapid rabies enzyme immuno-diagnosis (RREID): a usefull and simple technique for the routine diagnosis of rabies. J. Biol. Stand., 14, 217-222. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Perrin P., Sureau P. (1987): A collaborative study of an experimental kit for rapid rabies enzyme immunodiagnosis (RREID). Bull. WHO, 65, 489-493.
  27. Reed L.J., Muench H.A. (1938): Simple method for estimating 50% end points. Amer. J. Hyg., 27, 493-497. Go to original source...
  28. Svrcek S. (2002): Rabies. In: Svrcek S. (ed.): Viral and prion diseases of animals (in Slovak). M & M, Presov. 319-338.
  29. Tordo N., Poch O., Ermine A., Keith G. (1986a): Primary structure of leader RNA and nucleoprotein genes of the rabies genom: segmented homology with VSV. Nucl. Acid Res., 14, 2671-2683. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Tordo N., Poch O., Ermine A., Keith G., Rougeon F. (1986b): Walking along the rabies genom: is the large G-L intergenic region a remnant gene? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 3914-3918. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Tordo N., Sacramento D., Bourhy H. (1996): The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique for diagnosis, typing and epidemiological studies of rabies. In: Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (eds.): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva. 157-169.
  32. Umoh J.U., Blenden D.C. (1981): Immunofluorescent staining of rabies virus antigen in formalin fixed tissue a er treatment with trypsin. Bull. WHO, 59, 737-744.
  33. Webster W.A., Casey G.A. (1996): Virus isolation in neuroblastoma cell culture In: Meslin F.X., Kaplan M.M., Koprowski H. (eds.): Laboratory Techniques in Rabies. 4th ed. WHO, Geneva. 96-103.
  34. Webster L.T., Dawson J.R. (1935): Early diagnosis of rabies
  35. Vilcek S., Herring A.J., Herring J.A., Ne leton P.F., Lowings by moue inoculation. Measurement of humoral immuJ.P., Paton D.J. (1994): Pestiviruses isolated from pigs, ca le and sheep can be allocated into at least three genogroups using polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Arch. Virol., 136, 309-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.