Vet Med - Czech, 2017, 62(6):342-350 | DOI: 10.17221/109/2016-VETMED

Comparison of a full-spectrum multi-analyte clinical analyser with six reference instruments using canine and feline blood samplesOriginal Paper

C.S. Lin1, G.H. Chiang1, C.H. Liu1, H.C. Tsai2, C.C. Yang2, K. Chen3, S.K. Huang3, T.L. Cheng*,4, C.C. Chou*,4
1 School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
2 ProtectLife International Biomedical, Inc.
3 UHSIO Taiwan, Inc.
4 College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

In this study, we report the characterisation of a novel centrifugation and spectrum-integrated veterinary clinical analyser, the AmiShieldTM, which has been developed for the multiplex measurement of biochemical, electrolyte and immunoassay parameters in a point-of-care testing environment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the analytical performance of the AmiShieldTM and to compare it with six reference instruments using clinical blood samples. Two hundred and four canine and 120 feline blood samples collected from veterinary teaching hospitals were analysed in parallel using the AmiShield and appropriate reference instruments. All results were evaluated separately for canine and feline specimens. The instrument's analytical performance was evaluated initially for short- and long-term precision, bias, and observed total error using quality control material. This was followed by comparison of clinical specimens on the AmiShield analyser in parallel with the Vitros and Hitachi for biochemical parameters, VetScan and SNAPshot for total bile acids, and VetLyte and Biolyte for electrolytes. Overall, the AmiShield analyser's performance met the standards of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology for total allowable error for most analytes, and can be considered suitable for use in veterinary clinical practices. Using canine samples, excellent correlation coefficients (r ≧ 0.92) were identified for 14 analytes of various categories including glucose, total protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, amylase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, phosphorus, Na+, K+, Cl- and total bile acid, while good correlations (0.91 ≧ r ≧ 0.80) were recorded for albumin (r = 0.91). Bland-Altman difference plots also showed agreement (greater than 95% within Limits of Agreement) for glucose, total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, amylase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, Na+, K+, Cl- and total bile acid between AmiShield and the reference instruments. However, aspartate aminotransferase and phosphorus exhibited higher outliers, implying potential problems associated with matrix interferences such as lipemic samples, which warrant further study. This study demonstrates that the AmiShield compares favourably with standard reference instruments, and the new device generated data of high quality for most analytes in clinical canine and feline samples. The capability of reliably measuring multi-category analytes in one device using minute amounts (170 μl) of whole blood and short turn-around times (< 15 min) underlines the high potential of the device as a good alternative in-house diagnostic application.

Keywords: point-of-care; multi-analytes; whole blood

Published: June 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lin CS, Chiang GH, Liu CH, Tsai HC, Yang CC, Chen K, et al.. Comparison of a full-spectrum multi-analyte clinical analyser with six reference instruments using canine and feline blood samples. Vet Med - Czech. 2017;62(6):342-350. doi: 10.17221/109/2016-VETMED.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file109-16 Lin - supplementary material.pdf

File size: 6.07 MB

References

  1. Bland JM, Altman DG (2010): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 931-936. Go to original source...
  2. Broughton PM, Buckley BM (1987): Performance requirements of tests performed nearer the patient. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 47, 99-104. Go to original source...
  3. Flatland B, Friedrichs KR, Klenner S (2014): Differentiating between analytical and diagnostic performance evaluation with a focus on the method comparison study and identification of bias. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 43, 475-486. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gary TE, Pratt MC, Cusick PK (1999): Determination of agreement between laboratory instruments. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 38, 56-59.
  5. Harr KE, Flatland B, Nabity M, Freeman KP (2013): ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 42, 424-436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hubl W, Wejbora R, Shafti-Keramat I, Haider A, Hajdusich P, Bayer PM (1994): Enzymatic determination of sodium, potassium, and chloride in abnormal (hemolyzed, icteric, lipemic, paraproteinemic, or uremic) serum samples compared with indirect determination with ion-selective electrodes. Clinical Chemistry 40, 1528-1531. Go to original source...
  7. Jensen AL, Kjelgaard-Hansen M (2006): Method comparison in the clinical laboratory. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 35, 276-286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Papasouliotis K, Dodkin S, Murphy K, Woloszczuk G, Fleming M (2006): Analysis of canine and feline blood samples using the Kuadro in-house wet-reagent chemistry analyser. Journal of Small Animal Practice 47, 190-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Papasouliotis K, Dodkin S, Murphy KF, Sladen A (2008): Comparison of measurements of 18 analytes in canine and feline blood samples using the in-practice Falcor 350 and the reference KoneLab 30i analysers. Journal of Small Animal Practice 49, 494-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Tsai HC, Doong RA (2004): Simultaneous determination of renal clinical analytes in serum using hydrolase- and oxidase-encapsulated optical array biosensors. Analytical Biochemistry 334, 183-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Tsai HC, Doong RA (2005): Simultaneous determination of pH, urea, acetylcholine and heavy metals using arraybased enzymatic optical biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 20, 1796-1804. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. West E, Bardell D, Senior JM (2014): Comparison of the EPOC and i-STAT analysers for canine blood gas and electrolyte analysis. Journal of Small Animal Practice 55, 139-144. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.