Vet Med - Czech, 2010, 55(3):113-118 | DOI: 10.17221/157/2009-VETMED
Uterine prolapse in cows: Effect of raising the rear end on the clinical outcomes and reproductive performance
- 1 Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of raising the rear end when replacing the prolapsed uterus in cows on the outcome and reproductive performance. A total of 76 cows with uterine prolapse were investigated, 10 of which had died before treatment. According to the posture, cows were divided into standing (Standing: n = 11) and recumbent (Recumbent: n = 55). Recumbent cows were subdivided randomly into lying (Lying: n = 24), lifting up using a cow-lift (Cow-lift: n = 18), and raising hind legs using a tractor (Raising: n = 13). Recovery rate after treatment of all cows was 60.6%. The recovery rate of Recumbent (52.7%) was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than Standing (100%). Among the recumbent cows, Lying showed the lowest recovery rate (37.5%), which was significantly lower than the recovery rate (64.5%) of the combined Cow-lift and Raising groups. The mean nonpregnant term of Raising (144 days) was significantly (P < 0.05) shorter than of Cow-lift (297 days). In conclusion, the method of replacing the uterus by raising the hind legs during treatment of uterine prolapse in cows could improve the recovery rate and breeding performance.
Keywords: cow; raising hind legs; posture; uterine prolapsed; replace
Published: March 31, 2010 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Gardner IA, Reynolds JP, Risco CA, Hird DW (1990): Patterns of uterine prolapse in dairy cows and prognosis after treatment. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197, 1021-1024.
Go to original source...
- Hibberd RC (2004): Replacing the prolapsed bovine uterus. Veterinary Record, 155, 96.
- Jackson PG (1995): 13 postparturient problems in large animals. In: Jackson PG (ed.): Handbook of Veterinary Obstetrics. 2nd ed. WB Saunders, London. 209-232.
Go to original source...
- Jubb TF, Malmo J, Brightling P, Davis GM (1990): Survival and fertility after uterine prolapse in dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal, 67, 22-24.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Miesner MD, Anderson DE, (2008): Management of uterine prolapse in bovine. Veterinary Clinic North American Food Animal Practice, 24, 409-419.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Munro IB (2004): Replacing the prolapsed bovine uterus. Veterinary Record, 155, 344.
- Murphy AM, Dobson H (2002): Predisposition, subsequent fertility, and mortality of cows with uterine prolapse. Veterinary Record, 151, 733-735.
- Potter T (2008): Prolapse of the uterus in the cow. UK Veterinary Journal, 13, 1-3. http://www.ukvet.co.uk/ukvet/articles/Cattle_uterus%20prolapse.pdf
Go to original source...
- Risco CA, Reynolds JP, Hird D (1984): Uterine prolapse and hypocalcemia in dairy cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 185, 1517-1519.
- Roberts SJ (1986): 11 injuries and diseases of the puerperal period. In: Roberts SJ (ed.): Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases. 3rd ed. Vermont, Woodstock. 353-397.
- White A, (2007): Uterine prolapse in the cow. UK Veterinary Journal, 12, 1-3. http://www.ukvet.co.uk/ukvet/articles/Cattle_uterine%20prolapse.pdf
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.